On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:32:53PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 07:24 +0000, Patchwork wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: drm/i915: Add missing NULL check before calling > > initial_watermarks (rev2) > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/3930/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > Series 3930v2 drm/i915: Add missing NULL check before calling > > initial_watermarks > > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/3930/revisions/2/mbox > > / > > > > Test kms_flip: > > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms: > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p) UNSTABLE > > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank: > > pass -> FAIL (hsw-gt2) > > On HSW this patch shouldn't matter, but I haven't seen this problem > earlier, so opened a bug for it: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94347 Could be a duplicate of https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94294 but I was too lazy to see i the ts vs. seq has the same 1 frame difference. We should improve the asserts in the test to give us more easily digestible information. > > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (hsw-brixbox) > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (bdw-ultra) > > This is a hw-access-while-suspended failure on the watermark optimize > path, not relevant to this change. I'm guessing it was introduced by > the two stage WM support patch. A fix would be to take a wake reference > around the WM programming, or avoid the programming in cases where > everything is inactive. Adding Matt and Maarten. > > > Subgroup basic-plain-flip: > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (hsw-gt2) > > Same as above. > > > Test kms_force_connector_basic: > > Subgroup force-connector-state: > > pass -> SKIP (snb-x220t) > > Subgroup force-edid: > > pass -> SKIP (snb-x220t) > > Subgroup force-load-detect: > > fail -> DMESG-FAIL (ivb-t430s) > > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic: > > Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c: > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2) > > Test pm_rpm: > > Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state: > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (snb-dellxps) > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (byt-nuc) > > Subgroup basic-rte: > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (snb-x220t) > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (byt-nuc) UNSTABLE > > For all the above failures, the given platforms are not relevant to > this change. > > > > > bdw- > > nuci7 total:166 pass:155 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:1 > > 1 > > bdw- > > ultra total:169 pass:154 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:1 > > 4 > > bsw-nuc- > > 2 total:169 pass:137 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:30 > > byt- > > nuc total:169 pass:143 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:2 > > 5 > > hsw- > > brixbox total:169 pass:154 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:1 > > 5 > > hsw- > > gt2 total:169 pass:156 dwarn:1 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:1 > > 0 > > ilk- > > hp8440p total:169 pass:117 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:5 > > 0 > > ivb- > > t430s total:169 pass:153 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:0 skip:1 > > 5 > > snb- > > dellxps total:169 pass:144 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:2 > > 3 > > snb- > > x220t total:169 pass:142 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:2 > > 4 > > > > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1497/ > > > > a1c053436ca45c5860f842e294ad29d6055bd43b drm-intel-nightly: 2016y- > > 02m-29d-16h-58m-26s UTC integration manifest > > ad1be9242b45df74f512fb0fda89c608c337560d drm/i915: Add missing NULL > > check before calling initial_watermarks > > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
