On ma, 2016-01-25 at 17:21 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:22:21PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On ti, 2016-01-19 at 13:49 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> > > Built on 00a0c7d1ae09b1259c7af8e5a088b0b225d805df drm-intel-
> > > nightly:
> > > 2016y-01m-18d-16h-50m-37s UTC integration manifest
> > >
> > > Test gem_ctx_basic:
> > > pass -> FAIL (bdw-ultra)
> >
> > Couldn't reproduce it on the same machine. To me it looks unrelated
> > as
> > it happened already several times for other patches, always on the
> > same
> > machine. These BAT results are not shown on the test's "long term"
> > history btw. I filed a bug:
>
> long term only shows changes, not all tests.
Ok, so I take that's changes for CI runs, but not for patchwork
initiated tests.
> Which means it didn't yet
> fail in -nightly, which is somewhat suspicious ... But I agree that
> this
> seems to have blown up a few times in other CI runs.
Ok, so based on that this patchset is good to go I guess.
Still not sure why the test fails. One thing I noticed is a bunch of
"gem_concurrent: drop caches" messages in dmesg before any test would
be even started. So I think something in gem_concurrent is not guarded
with igt_fixture{} and gets to run when piglit enumerates the subtests
(to get the BAT subtests). Not sure though if this has a negative
effect on anything.
--Imre
> -Daniel
>
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93776
> >
> > > Test kms_flip:
> > > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
> > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (skl-i5k-2)
> > > Test pm_rpm:
> > > Subgroup basic-rte:
> > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (byt-nuc) UNSTABLE
> > >
> > > bdw-
> > > nuci7 total:140 pass:131 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 sk
> > > ip:9
> > >
> > > bdw-
> > > ultra total:140 pass:132 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:1 sk
> > > ip:6
> > >
> > > byt-
> > > nuc total:143 pass:126 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:0 sk
> > > ip:1
> > > 5
> > > hsw-
> > > brixbox total:143 pass:136 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 sk
> > > ip:7
> > >
> > > hsw-
> > > gt2 total:143 pass:139 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 sk
> > > ip:4
> > >
> > > ilk-
> > > hp8440p total:143 pass:102 dwarn:3 dfail:0 fail:0 sk
> > > ip:3
> > > 8
> > > ivb-
> > > t430s total:137 pass:124 dwarn:3 dfail:4 fail:0 sk
> > > ip:6
> > >
> > > skl-i5k-
> > > 2 total:143 pass:134 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:8
> > >
> > > snb-
> > > dellxps total:143 pass:124 dwarn:5 dfail:0 fail:0 sk
> > > ip:1
> > > 4
> > > snb-
> > > x220t total:143 pass:124 dwarn:5 dfail:0 fail:1 sk
> > > ip:1
> > > 3
> > >
> > > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1220/
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
