On 03/17/2015 02:40 AM, Imre Deak wrote:
> The checks for PLL enabled state on CPU ports are valid only on GMCH
> platforms but atm we'd also call them on non-PCH-split/non-GMCH
> platforms like BXT, triggering false warnings. Until the proper check is
> implented for these platforms simply disable the check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index c060496..ff26752 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -2099,7 +2099,7 @@ static void intel_enable_pipe(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> * a plane. On ILK+ the pipe PLLs are integrated, so we don't
> * need the check.
> */
> - if (!HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv->dev))
> + if (HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(dev_priv->dev))
> if (intel_pipe_has_type(crtc, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI))
> assert_dsi_pll_enabled(dev_priv);
> else
> @@ -4376,7 +4376,7 @@ static void intel_crtc_load_lut(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> if (!crtc->state->enable || !intel_crtc->active)
> return;
>
> - if (!HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv->dev)) {
> + if (HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(dev_priv->dev)) {
> if (intel_pipe_has_type(intel_crtc, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI))
> assert_dsi_pll_enabled(dev_priv);
> else
>
It looks like we're doing dsi calls, so this must at least apply to BYT,
right? We might need more granularity here...
Jesse
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
