On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 07:42:56AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 08:40:29AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 07:00:06PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > > +typedef enum {
> > > + /* this maps to the kernel API */
> > > + IGT_ROTATION_0 = 1 << 0,
> > > + IGT_ROTATION_90 = 1 << 1,
> > > + IGT_ROTATION_180 = 1 << 2,
> > > + IGT_ROTATION_270 = 1 << 3,
> > > +} igt_rotation_t;
> >
> > Should we also add the flip X/Y bits, even if we currently don't support
> > this in the kernel?
>
> Presumably there are tests in here to check the kernel rejects
> unsupported combination of rotations and unknown reflections? In which,
> yes.
I guess we should try everything and check whether it either gets rejected
or works properly ...
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
