On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 08:40:29AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 07:00:06PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > +typedef enum {
> > + /* this maps to the kernel API */
> > + IGT_ROTATION_0 = 1 << 0,
> > + IGT_ROTATION_90 = 1 << 1,
> > + IGT_ROTATION_180 = 1 << 2,
> > + IGT_ROTATION_270 = 1 << 3,
> > +} igt_rotation_t;
>
> Should we also add the flip X/Y bits, even if we currently don't support
> this in the kernel?
Presumably there are tests in here to check the kernel rejects
unsupported combination of rotations and unknown reflections? In which,
yes.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
