On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:30:52PM +0000, S, Deepak wrote: > > Hi Ville, > > > > I am Ok with cleaning up and pushing the Code. Can you please tell me > > when we need to start pushing the code and branch to use > > (drm-intel-next)? > > Well you can consider it pushed now that it's in the open. The patches > just need a bit of extra polish I think. Well, unless you're planning > a full blown rewrite of the code ;) > > I guess you need to take into consideration whatever bdw rc6/rps patches > are still in flight, but since you've been doing some review there I > think you have a better idea than I do how things are progressing. > > I always work on top of nightly, so I guess that's a good choice :) Yes, -nightly is always the recommended branch to base upstream patches on. I'll sort out the conflict mess (or well, try to) if it doesn't apply to plain dinq or some other branch. drm-intel-next tends to be too outdated ;-) -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
