On 4/9/2014 10:23 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:30:52PM +0000, S, Deepak wrote:
Hi Ville,
I am Ok with cleaning up and pushing the Code. Can you please tell me
when we need to start pushing the code and branch to use
(drm-intel-next)?
Well you can consider it pushed now that it's in the open. The patches
just need a bit of extra polish I think. Well, unless you're planning
a full blown rewrite of the code ;)
I guess you need to take into consideration whatever bdw rc6/rps patches
are still in flight, but since you've been doing some review there I
think you have a better idea than I do how things are progressing.
I always work on top of nightly, so I guess that's a good choice :)
Yes, -nightly is always the recommended branch to base upstream patches
on. I'll sort out the conflict mess (or well, try to) if it doesn't apply
to plain dinq or some other branch. drm-intel-next tends to be too
outdated ;-)
-Daniel
Hi Daniel/Ville.
Some of the patches are lined up for squashing right? So you want me to
work on this patches to align to upstream code and resubmit it to same
email thread?
Thanks
Deepak
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
