Thanks Ville. I agree patches need polishing :). I might rewrite some of
the patches based on testing :)
Most of the BDW Rc6/Rps patches are in. I guess some of the interrupt
related patch are pending.
Thanks
Deepak
On 4/9/2014 8:35 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:30:52PM +0000, S, Deepak wrote:
Hi Ville,
I am Ok with cleaning up and pushing the Code. Can you please tell me when we need to start pushing the code and branch to use (drm-intel-next)?
Well you can consider it pushed now that it's in the open. The patches
just need a bit of extra polish I think. Well, unless you're planning
a full blown rewrite of the code ;)
I guess you need to take into consideration whatever bdw rc6/rps patches
are still in flight, but since you've been doing some review there I
think you have a better idea than I do how things are progressing.
I always work on top of nightly, so I guess that's a good choice :)
Thanks
Deepak
-----Original Message-----
From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 6:55 PM
To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: S, Deepak; Deak, Imre
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/71] drm/i915/chv: Add Cherryview support
As you may have noticed some of this stuf may need a bit of work still to fit in better with the more recent upstream changes.
So I think we need a few people to do some work here to the the patches into a really good shape. So some division of labor would in order. I'm proposing the following:
rc6/turbo -> Deepak as he's written the code anyway interrupts -> Imre since he worked on the VLV interrupts recently
The rest of the patches should be fairly OK I think. So for the rest we probably just need reviews mostly, and maybe we want to squash some of the more trivial patches.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
