On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:36:11PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 03 Mar 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... it's this time of the year again. Originally we've frobbed this to > > fix up some regressions, but maybe our DP code improved sufficiently > > now that we can dare to do again what the spec recommends. > > > > This reverts > > > > commit 2514bc510d0c3aadcc5204056bb440fa36845147 > > Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Thu Jun 21 15:13:50 2012 -0700 > > > > drm/i915: prefer wide & slow to fast & narrow in DP configs > > > > I'm pretty sure I'll regret this patch, but otoh I expect we won't > > make progress here without poking the devil occasionally. > > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > I agree we should bite the bullet and do this. This is what the DP specs > tell us to do. I'm pretty sure there will be regressions, but I'm also > starting to believe there's a greater number of machines that are > currently either broken beyond repair or papered over with some hacks > than the number that will regress. We should just dig into them and fix > them instead of burying our heads in the sand. Queued for -next, thanks for the review. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
