On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 08:41:08PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:34:22PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:12:17PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > - 6/9 lacks review ... > > > > > > > 6/9 can be skipped for this series, though I think it's a reasonable > > patch. Maybe Chris or Jesse has an opinion on 6/9? > > Yes, programming random values into the hardware is just bonghits. And > then people come along complaining how the idiotic programming guide is > sacrosanct and must be adherred to... > > Otoh, changing the value of GEN6_RC_VIDEO_FREQ is worrying as we never > reprogram it nor have I come across any instructions as to what it does. > -Chris Can I take a _____by: if I drop GEN6_RC_VIDEO_FREQ? > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
