On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:34:22PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:12:17PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > - 6/9 lacks review ... > > > > 6/9 can be skipped for this series, though I think it's a reasonable > patch. Maybe Chris or Jesse has an opinion on 6/9? Yes, programming random values into the hardware is just bonghits. And then people come along complaining how the idiotic programming guide is sacrosanct and must be adherred to... Otoh, changing the value of GEN6_RC_VIDEO_FREQ is worrying as we never reprogram it nor have I come across any instructions as to what it does. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
