Re: [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915: Simplify cdclk_disable_noatomic()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2025-03-04 at 17:04 +0200, Govindapillai, Vinod wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 23:19 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Instead of hand rolling the cdclk state disabling for a
> > pipe in noatomic() let's just recompute the whole thing
> > from scratch. Less code we have to remember to keep in sync.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 7 +------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > index 62caee4a8b64..2a8749a0213e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > @@ -3364,13 +3364,8 @@ void intel_cdclk_update_hw_state(struct intel_display *display)
> >  void intel_cdclk_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> >  {
> >  	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc);
> > -	struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state =
> > -		to_intel_cdclk_state(display->cdclk.obj.state);
> > -	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> >  
> > -	cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe] = 0;
> > -	cdclk_state->min_voltage_level[pipe] = 0;
> > -	cdclk_state->active_pipes &= ~BIT(pipe);
> > +	intel_cdclk_update_hw_state(display);
> >  }
> >  
> 
> Okay! Now I see that passing active_pipes to intel_cdclk_update_hw_state() as I commented in one
> of
> the earlier patch wont work!
> 
> But isnt this bit efficient, as we will be calling,  intel_cdclk_crtc_disable_noatomic() (and
> intel_cdclk_update_hw_state()) for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(), we end up executing
> intel_cdclk_update_hw_state() redundantly?
> 
> Instead should we extract intel_cdclk_update_crtc_hw_state() from  intel_cdclk_update_hw_state() 
> and use that here?
> 
> BR
> Vinod

Forgot to RB, with the above comments' relevancy checked out,
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@xxxxxxxxx>

> 
> 
> >  static int intel_compute_max_dotclk(struct intel_display *display)
> 





[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux