On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 23:19 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Instead of hand rolling the cdclk state disabling for a
> pipe in noatomic() let's just recompute the whole thing
> from scratch. Less code we have to remember to keep in sync.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 62caee4a8b64..2a8749a0213e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -3364,13 +3364,8 @@ void intel_cdclk_update_hw_state(struct intel_display *display)
> void intel_cdclk_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc);
> - struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state =
> - to_intel_cdclk_state(display->cdclk.obj.state);
> - enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>
> - cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe] = 0;
> - cdclk_state->min_voltage_level[pipe] = 0;
> - cdclk_state->active_pipes &= ~BIT(pipe);
> + intel_cdclk_update_hw_state(display);
> }
>
Okay! Now I see that passing active_pipes to intel_cdclk_update_hw_state() as I commented in one of
the earlier patch wont work!
But isnt this bit efficient, as we will be calling, intel_cdclk_crtc_disable_noatomic() (and
intel_cdclk_update_hw_state()) for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(), we end up executing
intel_cdclk_update_hw_state() redundantly?
Instead should we extract intel_cdclk_update_crtc_hw_state() from intel_cdclk_update_hw_state()
and use that here?
BR
Vinod
> static int intel_compute_max_dotclk(struct intel_display *display)
