Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2025-01-31 20:49:35-03:00)
>On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 05:16:29PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
>>Quoting Krzysztof Karas (2025-01-30 11:18:28-03:00)
>>>Hi Gustavo,
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>> Let's remove that check, since it is unnecessary and causes the
>>>> inconsistency illustrated above.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>>Would you add:
>>>Fixes: c01e78a96e12 ("drm/i915/dmc_wl: Sanitize enable_dmc_wl according to hardware support")?
>>
>>I believe the above commit should not be a "fixes" candidate, the check
>>for intel_dmc_has_payload() was already there when that commit was
>>applied.
>>
>>Also, do we need a "Fixes:" tag here? There only platform where the DMC
>>Wakelock mechanism is enabled by default is PTL, which is still under
>>force_probe protection.
>
>it's not user visible, so no. Sometimes we may want to backport fixes
>for platforms that may be used with previous kernel versions, but that
>is mainly when we are close to remove the force_probe.
Okay. Thanks!
Krzysztof, does the r-b stand without the "Fixes" tag?
--
Gustavo Sousa
>
>Lucas De Marchi
>
>>
>>--
>>Gustavo Sousa
>>
>>>
>>>after that LGTM:
>>>Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>Krzysztof
