Hi, In regards to patches sent to over wrong mailing list id which is " v5-000intel-xe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ". Seems like some prefix got added while sending it to intel-xe mailing list. That's why sent correctly to intel-gfx but mail delivery failed for intel-xe. I will float the revision again if there are any pending comments on current patch series, or I will refloat on both intel-gfx and intel-xe, which ever works best. Suggestion will be helpful to correct this. Regards, Mitul > -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Mitul > Golani > Sent: 15 January 2025 20:47 > To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; v5-000intel-xe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Nautiyal, Ankit K <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx>; Nikula, Jani > <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>; Syrjala, Ville <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH v5 0/7] Check Scaler and DSC Prefill Latency Against Vblank > > Compute and check if dsc and scaler prefill latency is sufficient with respect > to vblank. > > Previous Revision Reference: > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/141203/ > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/142745/ > > Mitul Golani (7): > drm/i915/scaler: Add and compute scaling factors > drm/i915/scaler: Use crtc_state to setup plane or pipe scaler > drm/i915/scaler: Refactor max_scale computation > drm/i915/scaler: Compute scaling factors for pipe scaler > drm/i915/scaler: Limit pipe scaler downscaling factors for YUV420 > drm/i915/scaler: Check if vblank is sufficient for scaler > drm/i915/dsc: Check if vblank is sufficient for dsc prefill > > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 2 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c | 123 ++++++++++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 84 +++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.48.0
