On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Ian Romanick <idr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 10/27/2013 05:30 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:42:35PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: >>>>> Since the Mesa merge window is closing soon, I'm finally getting back on >>>>> this. I've pushed a rebase of my old Mesa branch to my fd.o repo >>>>> >>>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~idr/mesa/log/?h=robustness3 >>>>> >>>>> I have a couple questions... >>>>> >>>>> 1. Has any of this landed an a kernel tree anywhere? >>>> >>>> Afaik everything but the actual ioctl and i-g-t testcase has landed. >>> >>> And that stuff will land once my patches hit the Mesa list or ... ? >> >> Yup. > > Hey kernel first, then upstream projects, at the moment libdrm has > ioctls in it that I have no upstream solid kernel commit for, > > Either in the next 24 hrs I have this in my tree or the libdrm commits > need to be reverted, > > and if someone releases libdrm in that time span then I'm going to be > quite pissed. It's kinda too late imo for 3.13 (and there's an open question whether we need one more flag or not), so I wanted to pull it in into 3.14. Which also gives us plenty of time to add or not add that optional flag. So I guess time to revert. Can you do that pls? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
