On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Ian Romanick <idr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/27/2013 05:30 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:42:35PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: >>> Since the Mesa merge window is closing soon, I'm finally getting back on >>> this. I've pushed a rebase of my old Mesa branch to my fd.o repo >>> >>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~idr/mesa/log/?h=robustness3 >>> >>> I have a couple questions... >>> >>> 1. Has any of this landed an a kernel tree anywhere? >> >> Afaik everything but the actual ioctl and i-g-t testcase has landed. > > And that stuff will land once my patches hit the Mesa list or ... ? Yup. >>> 2. Has any support code landed in a libdrm tree anywhere? >> >> Dunno whether Mika has libdrm patches. Since mesa is the only expected >> user I'd just go with putting the ioctl wrapper (using the drmIoctl >> helper) into mesa itself, that get rids of a dep for merging this support. > > What's the right way to get the ctx_id out of the drm_intel_context? > That struct is private to libdrm, but the ioctl needs it. Hm, I guess then we need something in libdrm. I've just figured for stuff that only mesa really cares about like the hw contexts here libdrm wrappers are a bit pointless since it adds a 2nd ABI barrier with no real gain. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
