On Mon, 13 May 2024, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 03:10:29PM GMT, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>On Fri, 10 May 2024, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The xe->enabled_irq_mask member has never been used for anything.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>Lucas, ack for merging these two via drm-intel-next? Even though these
>>touch struct xe_device, I presume any further cleanups touching the
>>surrounding context would have a bigger footprint in drm-intel-next.
>
>
>
> Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> for both patches
Thanks for the review and acks, pushed to drm-intel-next.
BR,
Jani.
>
> thanks,
> Lucas De Marchi
>
>>
>>BR,
>>Jani.
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 1 -
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 2 --
>>> 2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>>> index 0de0566e5b39..fbe2c2eddea9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>>> @@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> xe->display.hotplug.dp_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("xe-dp", 0);
>>>
>>> drmm_mutex_init(&xe->drm, &xe->sb_lock);
>>> - xe->enabled_irq_mask = ~0;
>>>
>>> return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, display_destroy, NULL);
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>> index 906b98fb973b..b78223e3baab 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>> @@ -517,8 +517,6 @@ struct xe_device {
>>> /* only to allow build, not used functionally */
>>> u32 irq_mask;
>>>
>>> - u32 enabled_irq_mask;
>>> -
>>> struct intel_uncore {
>>> spinlock_t lock;
>>> } uncore;
>>
>>--
>>Jani Nikula, Intel
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
