On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:24:19PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> On 22.02.2023 18:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 04:35:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> > >> > > Andrzej Hajda (7): >> > > arch: rename all internal names __xchg to __arch_xchg >> > > linux/include: add non-atomic version of xchg >> > > arch/*/uprobes: simplify arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr >> > > llist: simplify __llist_del_all >> > > io_uring: use __xchg if possible >> > > qed: use __xchg if possible >> > > drm/i915/gt: use __xchg instead of internal helper >> > >> > Nothing crazy in here I suppose, I somewhat wonder why you went through >> > the trouble, but meh. >> >> If you are asking why I have proposed this patchset, then the answer is >> simple, 1st I've tried to find a way to move internal i915 helper to core >> (see patch 7). >> Then I was looking for possible other users of this helper. And apparently >> there are many of them, patches 3-7 shows some. >> >> >> > >> > You want me to take this through te locking tree (for the next cycle, >> > not this one) where I normally take atomic things or does someone else >> > want this? >> >> If you could take it I will be happy. > > OK, I'll go queue it in tip/locking/core after -rc1. Thanks! Is this where the series fell between the cracks, or was there some follow-up that I missed? I think this would still be useful. Andrzej, would you mind rebasing and resending if there are no objections? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel
