On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:51:34PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Matt Turner <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> We were seriously *requiring* libdrm_nouveau unless explicitly disabled? >> > >> > I've had a bit of hilarious fail with optional testcases that >> > automatically get disabled when depencies aren't around. Hence why >> > they're all required by default with the optional switch to disable >> > them. >> >> You've had this problem in general, or with nouveau? > > In general. So I think what I'm saying is that the nouveau support in intel-gpu-tools isn't the project's primary purpose, so we should allow it to build without nouveau support if you don't have nouveau installed. If you don't have nouveau installed, you're not making a mistake by not building intel-gpu-tools without support. And if you have nouveau installed, you still get nouveau support. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
