On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:51:34PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Matt Turner <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> We were seriously *requiring* libdrm_nouveau unless explicitly disabled? > > > > I've had a bit of hilarious fail with optional testcases that > > automatically get disabled when depencies aren't around. Hence why > > they're all required by default with the optional switch to disable > > them. > > You've had this problem in general, or with nouveau? In general. > I mean, this is kind of how autotools is supposed to work. If you > explicitly want to ensure something is built you add --enable-thing. Yeah, but otoh I'm positively incompetent ;-) And since the main use case for i-g-t is to distribute the tests autoconf doesn't quite work like it usually does. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
