On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Matt Turner <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> We were seriously *requiring* libdrm_nouveau unless explicitly disabled? > > I've had a bit of hilarious fail with optional testcases that > automatically get disabled when depencies aren't around. Hence why > they're all required by default with the optional switch to disable > them. You've had this problem in general, or with nouveau? I mean, this is kind of how autotools is supposed to work. If you explicitly want to ensure something is built you add --enable-thing. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
