On 10/11/2013 03:30 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 10/11/2013 02:37 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:18:00 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Mario Kleiner | 2013-09-26 18:16:47 [+0200]:
Good! I will do that. Thanks for clarifying the irq and constraints
on raw locks in the other thread.
Are there any suggestions for "now"? preempt_disable_nort() like Luis
suggesed?
The preempt_disable_nort() is rather pointless, because the
preempt_disable() was added specifically for -rt. When PREEMPT_RT is
not enabled, preemption is disabled there already by the previous calls
to spin_lock().
Either way. Then I remove the preempt_enable/disable call. Any
objections?
Good with me. I'm currently working on a replacement.
-mario
-- Steve
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
