On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:18:00 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Mario Kleiner | 2013-09-26 18:16:47 [+0200]: > > >Good! I will do that. Thanks for clarifying the irq and constraints > >on raw locks in the other thread. > > Are there any suggestions for "now"? preempt_disable_nort() like Luis > suggesed? > The preempt_disable_nort() is rather pointless, because the preempt_disable() was added specifically for -rt. When PREEMPT_RT is not enabled, preemption is disabled there already by the previous calls to spin_lock(). -- Steve _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
