On 10/11/2013 02:37 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:18:00 +0200 > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> * Mario Kleiner | 2013-09-26 18:16:47 [+0200]: >> >>> Good! I will do that. Thanks for clarifying the irq and constraints >>> on raw locks in the other thread. >> >> Are there any suggestions for "now"? preempt_disable_nort() like Luis >> suggesed? >> > > The preempt_disable_nort() is rather pointless, because the > preempt_disable() was added specifically for -rt. When PREEMPT_RT is > not enabled, preemption is disabled there already by the previous calls > to spin_lock(). Either way. Then I remove the preempt_enable/disable call. Any objections? > -- Steve > Sebastian _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
