On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 06:36:13PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 09:18:59AM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
no. the issue is not that it doesn't exist, but that the same path is
documented in 2 different places. If the interface is exactly the same,
there could be just 1 place to document it and then reuse the same file
(without the module name). If the interfaces are not identical, then we
should differentiate them like is done here.
Completely agreed.
+i915 maintainers
Are you ok with merging this through either xe or i915 trees
instead of splitting the patch? My preference is the first option.
it won't conflict with anything we have on our side there, so
it can go with drm-xe-next.
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
thank you all. Pushed to drm-xe-next.
Lucas De Marchi
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
