On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 09:18:59AM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> no. the issue is not that it doesn't exist, but that the same path is >> documented in 2 different places. If the interface is exactly the same, >> there could be just 1 place to document it and then reuse the same file >> (without the module name). If the interfaces are not identical, then we >> should differentiate them like is done here. Completely agreed. >> >> +i915 maintainers >> >> Are you ok with merging this through either xe or i915 trees >> instead of splitting the patch? My preference is the first option. > > it won't conflict with anything we have on our side there, so > it can go with drm-xe-next. > > Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> -- Jani Nikula, Intel
