On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 12 Dec 2023, Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > --- a/sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c
>> > +++ b/sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c
>> > @@ -1993,7 +1993,6 @@ static const struct snd_pci_quirk force_connect_list[] = {
>> > SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x103c, 0x871a, "HP", 1),
>> > SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x103c, 0x8711, "HP", 1),
>> > SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x103c, 0x8715, "HP", 1),
>> > - SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x1043, 0x8694, "ASUS", 1), /* SKL/KBL + PRIME B560M-A */
>>
>> So there's no replacement for this commit. Is that correct?
>>
>> I've rebased topic/core-for-CI on top of v6.7-rc6, and everything else
>> got resolved with the upstream commits but this. I left this one in for
>> now, should I drop it?
>
> yes, this can be dropped. This was reported in the bug report as one
> affected id, but it's not valid and I dropped in the series I sent
> upstream. The i915 CI had no failures with this dropped, so seems we are
> good to go.
Thanks, done.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
