On Tue, 12 Dec 2023, Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This reverts commit 6fb89f11e23453b081ec4695e5e66ccb4deb2fd0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c b/sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c
> index 5232c46a32a7..b152c941414f 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c
> @@ -1993,7 +1993,6 @@ static const struct snd_pci_quirk force_connect_list[] = {
> SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x103c, 0x871a, "HP", 1),
> SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x103c, 0x8711, "HP", 1),
> SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x103c, 0x8715, "HP", 1),
> - SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x1043, 0x8694, "ASUS", 1), /* SKL/KBL + PRIME B560M-A */
So there's no replacement for this commit. Is that correct?
I've rebased topic/core-for-CI on top of v6.7-rc6, and everything else
got resolved with the upstream commits but this. I left this one in for
now, should I drop it?
BR,
Jani.
> SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x1462, 0xec94, "MS-7C94", 1),
> SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x8086, 0x2060, "Intel NUC5CPYB", 1),
> SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x8086, 0x2081, "Intel NUC 10", 1),
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
