On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 02:50:57PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 05 Dec 2023, "Shankar, Uma" <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Yeah, writing 0 is done with an intention to disable it but that’s not the way to > >> have this option disabled. Infact there is no reason to write to it for DP1.4+ if sink > >> is compliant. > > > > The change looks ok and aligns with spec, its > > Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx> > > Ville, any further objections or concerns? Okay to merge? I guess a small comment on why we're avoiding the BW_SET in there might be good idea, lest we forget and try to reunify the two branches by accident. But otherwise seems fine. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
