On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, "Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Musial, Ewelina <ewelina.musial@xxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 4:25 PM >> To: Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen@xxxxxxxxx>; Jani Nikula >> <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Illipilli, TejasreeX <tejasreex.illipilli@xxxxxxxxx>; >> LGCI Bug Filing <lgci.bug.filing@xxxxxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko >> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid >> of IOSF GPIO (rev2) >> >> But this list had only series which were in queue here https://intel-gfx- >> ci.01.org/queue/index.html and today I was checking exactly how queue for >> shards is created and there are jobs which are not displayed there. Directly in >> Jenkins we do have multiple more jobs than in this queue only and I also killed >> them. I was discussing exactly this case today with Michał and he pointed out that >> in explanation below queues we do have highlighted: >> Due to technical limitation this is just an approximation of the queue. It is good >> for assessing the length of the queue, but should not be considered as >> completely accurate. > OK. So could have been in the list but not sure. Okay, timeout. I just pushed the series. I trust Hans' testing here, considering the likely platform impact of the series and CI coverage of said platforms. Thanks for the patches and review. BR, Jani. >> >> Regards, >> Ewelina >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen@xxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 3:04 PM >> To: Musial, Ewelina <ewelina.musial@xxxxxxxxx>; Jani Nikula >> <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Illipilli, TejasreeX <tejasreex.illipilli@xxxxxxxxx>; >> LGCI Bug Filing <lgci.bug.filing@xxxxxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko >> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid >> of IOSF GPIO (rev2) >> >> HI, >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of >> > Musial, Ewelina >> > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 3:39 PM >> > To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Illipilli, TejasreeX >> > <tejasreex.illipilli@xxxxxxxxx>; LGCI Bug Filing >> > <lgci.bug.filing@xxxxxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko >> > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th >> > attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev2) >> > >> > Hi, I reviewed what I could, and my conclusion is that CI.FULL for >> > this series was killed due to my work around 126526v6 - yesterday I >> > was asked to do whatever I can to speed up shards testing for >> > mentioned series and I killed multiple sessions which were higher in >> > queue. We do not have option to simply bump priority for premerge >> > series and the only way (not recommended but sometimes needed) is to >> > drop everything what is higher. I've added this series back to queue. >> > Sorry for inconvenience >> Nope. It was not part of that list. We checked that with Jani too. See those >> pictures we discussed. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Ewelina >> >> Br, >> Jani S -- Jani Nikula, Intel
