Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Musial, Ewelina <ewelina.musial@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 4:25 PM > To: Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen@xxxxxxxxx>; Jani Nikula > <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Illipilli, TejasreeX <tejasreex.illipilli@xxxxxxxxx>; > LGCI Bug Filing <lgci.bug.filing@xxxxxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid > of IOSF GPIO (rev2) > > But this list had only series which were in queue here https://intel-gfx- > ci.01.org/queue/index.html and today I was checking exactly how queue for > shards is created and there are jobs which are not displayed there. Directly in > Jenkins we do have multiple more jobs than in this queue only and I also killed > them. I was discussing exactly this case today with Michał and he pointed out that > in explanation below queues we do have highlighted: > Due to technical limitation this is just an approximation of the queue. It is good > for assessing the length of the queue, but should not be considered as > completely accurate. OK. So could have been in the list but not sure. > > Regards, > Ewelina > > -----Original Message----- > From: Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 3:04 PM > To: Musial, Ewelina <ewelina.musial@xxxxxxxxx>; Jani Nikula > <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Illipilli, TejasreeX <tejasreex.illipilli@xxxxxxxxx>; > LGCI Bug Filing <lgci.bug.filing@xxxxxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid > of IOSF GPIO (rev2) > > HI, > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of > > Musial, Ewelina > > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 3:39 PM > > To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Illipilli, TejasreeX > > <tejasreex.illipilli@xxxxxxxxx>; LGCI Bug Filing > > <lgci.bug.filing@xxxxxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th > > attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev2) > > > > Hi, I reviewed what I could, and my conclusion is that CI.FULL for > > this series was killed due to my work around 126526v6 - yesterday I > > was asked to do whatever I can to speed up shards testing for > > mentioned series and I killed multiple sessions which were higher in > > queue. We do not have option to simply bump priority for premerge > > series and the only way (not recommended but sometimes needed) is to > > drop everything what is higher. I've added this series back to queue. > > Sorry for inconvenience > Nope. It was not part of that list. We checked that with Jani too. See those > pictures we discussed. > > > > Regards, > > Ewelina > > Br, > Jani S
