Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] drm/i915/dp: Replace intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate() with drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Imre
> Deak
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 6:49 PM
> To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  [PATCH v2 04/11] drm/i915/dp: Replace
> intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate() with drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate()
> 
> Replace intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate() with the recently added
> drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks and Regards,
Arun R Murthy
--------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c      | 7 +------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h      | 1 -
>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 125903007a292..1e045e4fbe582 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -2394,7 +2394,7 @@ add_bw_alloc_overhead(int link_clock, int
> bw_overhead,
>  		      int pixel_data_rate, int link_data_rate,
>  		      u32 *data_m, u32 *data_n)
>  {
> -	bool is_uhbr = intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate(link_clock);
> +	bool is_uhbr = drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(link_clock);
>  	int ch_coding_efficiency =
>  		drm_dp_bw_channel_coding_efficiency(is_uhbr);
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 54bd0bffa9f08..1b80747044a80 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -121,15 +121,10 @@ bool intel_dp_is_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> 
>  static void intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> 
> -bool intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate(int rate)
> -{
> -	return rate >= 1000000;
> -}
> -
>  /* Is link rate UHBR and thus 128b/132b? */  bool intel_dp_is_uhbr(const
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)  {
> -	return intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate(crtc_state->port_clock);
> +	return drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(crtc_state->port_clock);
>  }
> 
>  static void intel_dp_set_default_sink_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) diff --git
> a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> index e80da67554196..664fa93bbf534 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> @@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ void intel_dp_audio_compute_config(struct intel_encoder
> *encoder,
>  				   struct drm_connector_state *conn_state);
> bool intel_dp_has_hdmi_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);  bool
> intel_dp_is_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); -bool intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate(int
> rate);  bool intel_dp_is_uhbr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);  bool
> intel_dp_is_port_edp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port);
> enum irqreturn intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> --
> 2.39.2





[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux