On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:37:37AM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote: > At least one TGL had regression when using u8 types > for entry setup frames calculation. So, let's switch > to use ints instead. > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c > index 3691f882e1c0..a4417e85f92a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c > @@ -1093,12 +1093,12 @@ static bool _compute_psr2_wake_times(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > return true; > } > > -static u8 intel_psr_entry_setup_frames(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > - const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode) > +static int intel_psr_entry_setup_frames(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode) > { > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp); > int psr_setup_time = drm_dp_psr_setup_time(intel_dp->psr_dpcd); > - u8 entry_setup_frames = 0; > + int entry_setup_frames = 0; You didn't change the other one in _psr_compute_config() so this still looks broken to me. > > if (psr_setup_time < 0) { > drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, > -- > 2.34.1 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel