On 10/26/2023 12:11 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:05:13PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 07:08:34PM +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
Fix below compiler warning:
intel_tc.c:1879:11: error: ‘%d’ directive output may be truncated
writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 3
[-Werror=format-truncation=]
"%c/TC#%d", port_name(port), tc_port + 1);
^~
intel_tc.c:1878:2: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 7 and 17 bytes
into a destination of size 8
snprintf(tc->port_name, sizeof(tc->port_name),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"%c/TC#%d", port_name(port), tc_port + 1);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
v2: use kasprintf(Imre)
Fixes: 3eafcddf766b ("drm/i915/tc: Move TC port fields to a new intel_tc_port struct")
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
Nit: port_name could be const.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
index 37b0f8529b4f..0fa54450d51b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ struct intel_tc_port {
struct delayed_work link_reset_work;
int link_refcount;
bool legacy_port:1;
- char port_name[8];
+ char *port_name;
enum tc_port_mode mode;
enum tc_port_mode init_mode;
enum phy_fia phy_fia;
@@ -1875,8 +1875,10 @@ int intel_tc_port_init(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, bool is_legacy)
else
tc->phy_ops = &icl_tc_phy_ops;
- snprintf(tc->port_name, sizeof(tc->port_name),
- "%c/TC#%d", port_name(port), tc_port + 1);
+ tc->port_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%c/TC#%d", port_name(port),
+ tc_port + 1);
+ if (!tc->port_name)
+ return -ENOMEM;
Missed it, but this needs to free tc;
Oh, thanks for catching it.
Regards,
Nirmoy
mutex_init(&tc->lock);
/* TODO: Combine the two works */
@@ -1897,6 +1899,7 @@ void intel_tc_port_cleanup(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
{
intel_tc_port_suspend(dig_port);
+ kfree(dig_port->tc->port_name);
kfree(dig_port->tc);
dig_port->tc = NULL;
}
--
2.41.0
