On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:05:13PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 07:08:34PM +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> > Fix below compiler warning:
> >
> > intel_tc.c:1879:11: error: ‘%d’ directive output may be truncated
> > writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 3
> > [-Werror=format-truncation=]
> > "%c/TC#%d", port_name(port), tc_port + 1);
> > ^~
> > intel_tc.c:1878:2: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 7 and 17 bytes
> > into a destination of size 8
> > snprintf(tc->port_name, sizeof(tc->port_name),
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > "%c/TC#%d", port_name(port), tc_port + 1);
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > v2: use kasprintf(Imre)
> >
> > Fixes: 3eafcddf766b ("drm/i915/tc: Move TC port fields to a new intel_tc_port struct")
> > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Nit: port_name could be const.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 9 ++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > index 37b0f8529b4f..0fa54450d51b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ struct intel_tc_port {
> > struct delayed_work link_reset_work;
> > int link_refcount;
> > bool legacy_port:1;
> > - char port_name[8];
> > + char *port_name;
> > enum tc_port_mode mode;
> > enum tc_port_mode init_mode;
> > enum phy_fia phy_fia;
> > @@ -1875,8 +1875,10 @@ int intel_tc_port_init(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, bool is_legacy)
> > else
> > tc->phy_ops = &icl_tc_phy_ops;
> >
> > - snprintf(tc->port_name, sizeof(tc->port_name),
> > - "%c/TC#%d", port_name(port), tc_port + 1);
> > + tc->port_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%c/TC#%d", port_name(port),
> > + tc_port + 1);
> > + if (!tc->port_name)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
Missed it, but this needs to free tc;
> >
> > mutex_init(&tc->lock);
> > /* TODO: Combine the two works */
> > @@ -1897,6 +1899,7 @@ void intel_tc_port_cleanup(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> > {
> > intel_tc_port_suspend(dig_port);
> >
> > + kfree(dig_port->tc->port_name);
> > kfree(dig_port->tc);
> > dig_port->tc = NULL;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
