On Mon, 02 Oct 2023, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Jani, > > adding a few folks in Cc for some extra eyes on this series. Thanks for the reviews and acks, pushed to drm-intel-next. drm-intel-next instead of drm-intel-gt-next because of the changes in i915_drv.h, and it's easier to sync from din to dign than vice versa. BR, Jani. > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:47:01AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Chopping up [1] to more digestable pieces. Start off with nuking >> i915->gt0. >> >> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/124418/ >> >> Jani Nikula (3): >> drm/i915/mocs: use to_gt() instead of direct &i915->gt >> drm/i915: allocate i915->gt0 dynamically >> drm/i915/gt: remove i915->gt0 in favour of i915->gt[0] >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 10 +++++++--- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 4 ++-- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 10 ++-------- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c | 1 - >> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > Michal, Michal and Tomasz, can you please check here? > > Thanks, > Andi -- Jani Nikula, Intel
