On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:20:51PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The current check just asserts that we need FEC to use DSC > > with (non-eDP) DP-SST. But MST also needs FEC for DSC. Just > > check for !eDP instead to cover all the cases correctly. > > 128b/132b won't have crtc->fec_enable set, as it's part of channel > encoding. We don't need to explicitly enable it in hardware, the > 128b/132b bandwidth computations take it into account in the equation, > but we can't skip DSC based on !crtc_state->fec_enable either. Hmm. Right. I suppose we need a uhbr check here as well then. > > BR, > Jani. > > > > > > Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > > index 2cde8ac513bb..41f180f2879e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > > @@ -1380,7 +1380,7 @@ static bool intel_dp_supports_fec(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > > static bool intel_dp_supports_dsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > > const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > > { > > - if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_DP) && !crtc_state->fec_enable) > > + if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) && !crtc_state->fec_enable) > > return false; > > > > return intel_dsc_source_support(crtc_state) && > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel -- Ville Syrjälä Intel