On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:12:46AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2023, Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 03:41:30PM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > >> On 11.08.23 20:10, Mikhail Rudenko wrote: > > >> > On 2023-08-11 at 08:45 +02, Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> >> On 10.08.23 21:33, Mikhail Rudenko wrote: > > >> >>> The following is a copy an issue I posted to drm/i915 gitlab [1] two > > >> >>> months ago. I repost it to the mailing lists in hope that it will help > > >> >>> the right people pay attention to it. > > >> >> > > >> >> Thx for your report. Wonder why Dmitry (who authored a4e771729a51) or > > >> >> Thomas (who committed it) it didn't look into this, but maybe the i915 > > >> >> devs didn't forward the report to them. > > >> > > >> For the record: they did, and Jani mentioned already. Sorry, should have > > >> phrased this differently. > > >> > > >> >> Let's see if these mails help. Just wondering: does reverting > > >> >> a4e771729a51 from 6.5-rc5 or drm-tip help as well? > > >> > > > >> > I've redone my tests with 6.5-rc5, and here are the results: > > >> > (1) 6.5-rc5 -> still affected > > >> > (2) 6.5-rc5 + revert a4e771729a51 -> not affected > > >> > (3) 6.5-rc5 + two patches [1][2] suggested on i915 gitlab by @ideak -> not affected (!) > > >> > > > >> > Should we somehow tell regzbot about (3)? > > >> > > >> That's good to know, thx. But the more important things are: > > >> > > >> * When will those be merged? They are not yet in next yet afaics, so it > > >> might take some time to mainline them, especially at this point of the > > >> devel cycle. Imre, could you try to prod the right people so that these > > >> are ideally upstreamed rather sooner than later, as they fix a regression? > > > > > > I think the patches ([1] and [2]) could be merged via the drm-intel-next > > > (drm-intel-fixes) tree Cc'ing also stable. Jani, is this ok? > > > > It's fine by me, but need drm-misc maintainer ack to merge [1] via > > drm-intel. > > That's fine for me Thanks, I pushed the patches to drm-intel-next. > Maxime
