On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 03:41:30PM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: Hi, > On 11.08.23 20:10, Mikhail Rudenko wrote: > > On 2023-08-11 at 08:45 +02, Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 10.08.23 21:33, Mikhail Rudenko wrote: > >>> The following is a copy an issue I posted to drm/i915 gitlab [1] two > >>> months ago. I repost it to the mailing lists in hope that it will help > >>> the right people pay attention to it. > >> > >> Thx for your report. Wonder why Dmitry (who authored a4e771729a51) or > >> Thomas (who committed it) it didn't look into this, but maybe the i915 > >> devs didn't forward the report to them. > > For the record: they did, and Jani mentioned already. Sorry, should have > phrased this differently. > > >> Let's see if these mails help. Just wondering: does reverting > >> a4e771729a51 from 6.5-rc5 or drm-tip help as well? > > > > I've redone my tests with 6.5-rc5, and here are the results: > > (1) 6.5-rc5 -> still affected > > (2) 6.5-rc5 + revert a4e771729a51 -> not affected > > (3) 6.5-rc5 + two patches [1][2] suggested on i915 gitlab by @ideak -> not affected (!) > > > > Should we somehow tell regzbot about (3)? > > That's good to know, thx. But the more important things are: > > * When will those be merged? They are not yet in next yet afaics, so it > might take some time to mainline them, especially at this point of the > devel cycle. Imre, could you try to prod the right people so that these > are ideally upstreamed rather sooner than later, as they fix a regression? I think the patches ([1] and [2]) could be merged via the drm-intel-next (drm-intel-fixes) tree Cc'ing also stable. Jani, is this ok? > * They if possible ideally should be tagged for backporting to 6.4, as > this is a regression from the 6.3 cycle. > > But yes, let's tell regzbot that fixes are available, too: > > #regzbot fix: drm/i915: Fix HPD polling, reenabling the output poll work > as needed > > (for the record: that's the second of two patches apparently needed) > > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > -- > Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: > https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr > If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page. > > >> BTW, there was an earlier report about a problem with a4e771729a51 that > >> afaics was never addressed, but it might be unrelated. > >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230328023129.3596968-1-zhouzongmin@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/548590/?series=121050&rev=1 > > [2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/548591/?series=121050&rev=1 >
