On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for doing this Rodrigo. Review plan: > > Patches 1-4: Damien > Patch 5: Some bikeshed pending from earlier review ... > Patch 6-7: Atm in limbo, I've thought they're merged into the x86 tree already. > Patch 8: Ville > Patch 9-11: Rodrigo 9 - done 10 - I think it can be left with 15-16. 11 - Sorry, but I couldn't review it. I think Ben is the better one to review it. > Patch 12: lalala ;-) > Patch 13: I guess this can wait until we allow userspace to allocate > from stolen. So in a way requirements for this are missing from the > series. Maybe just drop for now? > Patch 14: Merged > Patch 15-16: Part of Chris' rps tuning and instrumentation > improvements. We need to review the latest versions of these (I'd > volunteer Jesse for the rps tuning). > Patch 17: Should be tested by someone else with a gt3. Who has one? > > Cheers, Daniel > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Let me introduce drm-intel-collector branch: >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector >> >> To describe drm-intel-collector I'll quote Daniel: >> "The overall idea is to make sure that simple patches don't get lost. >> Bigger patch series or feature work tends to not get lost, and really >> trivial patches I tend to merge right away. But 1-2 patch stuff in >> between is occasionally lost" >> >> Process: >> >> 1. Daniel pushs drm-intel-testing >> 2. I rebase drm-intel-collector onto drm-intel-testing >> 3. I collect all simple (1-2) patches that wasn't yet reviewed and not queued by Daniel >> 4. Request automated QA's PRTS automated i-g-t tests comparing drm-intel-testing x drm-intel-collector >> 5. If tests are ok I send the patches as a series to intel-gfx mailing list for better tracking and to be reviewed. >> >> There are some reasons that some patches can be left behind: >> 1. It was send so long time ago. I started with patches from Jul 26th. >> 2. Your patch didn't applied cleanly and I couldn't easily solve the conflicts. >> 3. Kernel didn't compiled with your patch. >> 4. I simply missed it. If you believe this is the case please warn me. >> >> Please help me to get these patches reviewed and queued by Daniel. >> >> Also, please let me know if you have further ideas how to improve this process. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Rodrigo. >> >> Chris Wilson (13): >> drm/i915: Do not add an interrupt for a context switch >> drm/i915: Rearrange the comments in i915_add_request() >> drm/i915: Pin pages whilst mapping the dma-buf >> drm/i915: Cancel outstanding modeset workers before suspend >> drm/i915: Always prefer CPU relocations with LLC >> drm/i915: Report requested frequency alongside current frequency in >> debugfs >> drm/i915: Move the conditional seqno query into the tracepoint >> drm/i915: Add some missing steps to i915_driver_load error path >> drm/i915: Asynchronously perform the set-base for a simple modeset >> drm/i915: Align tiled scanouts from stolen memory to 256k in the GTT >> drm/i915: Apply the force-detect VGA w/a to Valleyview >> drm/i915: Pair seqno completion tracepoint with its dispatch >> RFM drm/i915: Boost RPS frequency for CPU stalls >> >> Daniel Vetter (1): >> drm/i915: check that the i965g/gm 4G limit is really obeyed >> >> Jesse Barnes (2): >> drm/i915: split PCI IDs out into i915_drm.h v4 >> x86: add early quirk for reserving Intel graphics stolen memory v5 >> >> Rodrigo Vivi (1): >> drm/i915: Enable Lower Slice on Haswell GT3. >> >> arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 11 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 19 ++- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 164 +++++----------------- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 + >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 25 +++- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 12 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 41 +++--- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 7 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 20 +-- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 33 +++-- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c | 2 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 34 +++-- >> include/drm/i915_drm.h | 34 +++++ >> include/drm/i915_pciids.h | 211 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 16 files changed, 566 insertions(+), 206 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 include/drm/i915_pciids.h >> >> -- >> 1.8.1.4 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-gfx mailing list >> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- Rodrigo Vivi Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
