On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:36:30 -0800, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > > Since Chris' subtest didn't help in triggering the list corruption, I've > developed a new subtest that can do it. Since it is almost identical to the > one Chris added, I decided to reuse his code, then add my new subtest to perf > as well. But maybe you are right that my subtest better fits to another test. > not perf. I'll think this over. > > I hope this clarifies things for you. Thanks Janusz. Of course the test is valid but because it is not triggering bugs in perf perhaps it is better added to a different IGT file. Maybe gem_ctx_persistence? Maybe perf is also ok. Anyway something to think about. Thanks. -- Ashutosh
