On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 01:17:29 -0800, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > Hi Janusz, > Users reported oopses on list corruptions when using i915 perf with a > number of concurrently running graphics applications. That indicates we > are currently missing some important tests for such scenarios. Cover > that gap. Do these oops etc. have anything to do with perf itself or rather with persistence or non-persistence not properly supported with GuC? We should have seen such failures with persistence tests (with GuC) itself so I am wondering if there's any point of dragging perf into these already muddy waters? Such failures should be isolated first with other tests without mixing perf into this IMO. Thanks. -- Ashutosh
