> -----Original Message----- > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:30 AM > To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shankar, Uma > <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>; Navare, > Manasi D <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>; Roper, Matthew D > <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce struct cdclk_step > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 05:21:40PM +0000, Srivatsa, Anusha wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2022 12:04 PM > > > To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shankar, Uma > > > <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>; > > > Navare, Manasi D <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>; Roper, Matthew D > > > <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce struct cdclk_step > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 04:56:53PM +0000, Srivatsa, Anusha wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 2:59 PM > > > > > To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shankar, Uma > > > > > <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce struct cdclk_step > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 06:48:46PM +0000, Srivatsa, Anusha wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 1:20 AM > > > > > > > To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shankar, Uma > > > > > > > <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>; Vivi, Rodrigo > > > > > > > <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce struct cdclk_step > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 05:43:58PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > > > > > > > > This is a prep series for the actual cdclk refactoring > > > > > > > > that will be sent following this. Idea is to have a struct > > > > > > > > - cdclk_step that holds the following: > > > > > > > > - cdclk action (squash, crawl or modeset) > > > > > > > > - cdclk frequency > > > > > > > > which gets populated in atomic check. Driver uses the > > > > > > > > populated values during atomic commit to do the suitable > > > > > > > > sequence of actions like programming squash ctl registers > > > > > > > > in case of squashing or PLL sequence incase of modeset and so > on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This series just addresses the initial idea. The actual > > > > > > > > plumming in the atomic commit phase will be sent shortly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, people keep ignoring what I say so I just typed up the > > > > > > > code quickly. This to me seems like the most straightforward > > > > > > > way to do what > > > > > we need: > > > > > > > https://github.com/vsyrjala/linux.git cdclk_crawl_and_squash > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Totally untested ofc, apart from me doing a quick scan > > > > > > > through our cdclk tables for the crawl+squahs platforms to > > > > > > > make sure that this approach should produce sane values. > > > > > > Ville, > > > > > > Why have a mid cdclk_config? Cant we use the new-cdclk-config > > > > > > for this > > > > > purpose? > > > > > > > > > > You either > > > > > - start at old, crawl to mid, then squash to new > > > > > - start at old, squash to mid, then crawl to new > > > > > > > > Tested the changes on TGL(legacy) and DG2(squash). Took some time > > > > to > > > understand the code but the mid cdclk config logic works. @Ville > > > Syrjälä does replacing the intel_cdclk_can_squash() and > > > intel_cdclk_can_crawl() with your new cdclk_crawl_and_squash in atomic > check make sense? > > > > > > I don't think we should need any real logic at that point. > > > If we can squash and crawl then I think we can always do the cdclk > > > change w/o a modeset, at least with what we currently have defined > > > in the cdclk tables. > > > > @Ville Syrjälä is this patch in your radar to be sending out to the ML? Or > should I send it on your behalf? > > You can take over again if you want. Will do. Thanks Ville! Anusha > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel
