On Fri, 16 Sep 2022, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 11:26:42AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>Commit 00c6cbfd4e8a ("drm/i915: move pipe_mask and cpu_transcoder_mask
>>to runtime info") moved the pipe_mask member from struct
>>intel_device_info to intel_runtime_info, but overlooked some of our
>>platforms initializing device info .display = {}. This is significant,
>>as pipe_mask is the single point of truth for a device having a display
>>or not; the platforms in question left pipe_mask to whatever was set for
>>the platforms they "inherit" from in the complex macro scheme we have.
>>
>>Add new NO_DISPLAY macro initializing .__runtime.pipe_mask = 0, which
>>will cause the device info .display sub-struct to be zeroed in
>>intel_device_info_runtime_init(). A better solution (or simply audit of
>>proper use of HAS_DISPLAY() checks) is required before moving forward
>>with [1].
>>
>>Also clear all the display related members in runtime info if there's no
>>display. The latter is a bit tedious, but it's for completeness at this
>>time, to ensure similar functionality as before.
>>
>>[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/dfda1bf67f02ceb07c280b7a13216405fd1f7a34.1660137416.git.jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>>Fixes: 00c6cbfd4e8a ("drm/i915: move pipe_mask and cpu_transcoder_mask to runtime info")
>>Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
>>Cc: Maarten Lankhort <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>>---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 6 ++++++
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>index 77e7df21f539..cd4487a1d3be 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
>> .__runtime.media.ip.ver = (x), \
>> .__runtime.display.ip.ver = (x)
>>
>>+#define NO_DISPLAY .__runtime.pipe_mask = 0
>>+
>> #define I845_PIPE_OFFSETS \
>> .display.pipe_offsets = { \
>> [TRANSCODER_A] = PIPE_A_OFFSET, \
>>@@ -519,9 +521,8 @@ static const struct intel_device_info ivb_m_gt2_info = {
>> static const struct intel_device_info ivb_q_info = {
>> GEN7_FEATURES,
>> PLATFORM(INTEL_IVYBRIDGE),
>>+ NO_DISPLAY,
>> .gt = 2,
>>- .__runtime.pipe_mask = 0, /* legal, last one wins */
>>- .__runtime.cpu_transcoder_mask = 0,
>> .has_l3_dpf = 1,
>> };
>>
>>@@ -1039,7 +1040,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info xehpsdv_info = {
>> XE_HPM_FEATURES,
>> DGFX_FEATURES,
>> PLATFORM(INTEL_XEHPSDV),
>>- .display = { },
>>+ NO_DISPLAY,
>> .has_64k_pages = 1,
>> .needs_compact_pt = 1,
>> .has_media_ratio_mode = 1,
>>@@ -1081,7 +1082,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info dg2_info = {
>>
>> static const struct intel_device_info ats_m_info = {
>> DG2_FEATURES,
>>- .display = { 0 },
>>+ NO_DISPLAY,
>> .require_force_probe = 1,
>> .tuning_thread_rr_after_dep = 1,
>> };
>>@@ -1103,7 +1104,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info pvc_info = {
>> .__runtime.graphics.ip.rel = 60,
>> .__runtime.media.ip.rel = 60,
>> PLATFORM(INTEL_PONTEVECCHIO),
>>- .display = { 0 },
>>+ NO_DISPLAY,
>> .has_flat_ccs = 0,
>> .__runtime.platform_engine_mask =
>> BIT(BCS0) |
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>>index 1434dc33cf49..20575eb77ea7 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>>@@ -433,8 +433,14 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> dev_priv->drm.driver_features &= ~(DRIVER_MODESET |
>> DRIVER_ATOMIC);
>> memset(&info->display, 0, sizeof(info->display));
>>+
>>+ runtime->cpu_transcoder_mask = 0;
>> memset(runtime->num_sprites, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_sprites));
>> memset(runtime->num_scalers, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_scalers));
>>+ runtime->fbc_mask = 0;
>>+ runtime->has_hdcp = false;
>>+ runtime->has_dmc = false;
>>+ runtime->has_dsc = false;
>
> why are these not inside __runtime.display?
The short answer, because there isn't one. It's an anonymous struct for
now.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
