On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 04:03:43PM +0000, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: > On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 18:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 8/24/21 10:45 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Aug 2021, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hello drm-misc and drm-intel maintainers, > > > > > > > > My "Add support for out-of-band hotplug notification" patchset: > > > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93763/ > > > > > > > > Is ready for merging now, as discussed on IRC I based this series > > > > on top drm-tip and when trying to apply the i915 parts on top > > > > of drm-misc this fails due to conflict. > > > > > > > > So as Jani suggested here is a pull-req for a topic-branch with > > > > the > > > > entire set, minus the troublesome i915 bits. Once this has been > > > > merged > > > > into both drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next I can push the 2 i915 > > > > patch do drm-intel-next on top of the merge. > > > > > > > > Note there are also 2 drivers/usb/typec patches in here these > > > > have Greg KH's Reviewed-by for merging through the drm tree, > > > > Since this USB code does not change all that much. I also checked > > > > and the drm-misc-next-2021-08-12 base of this tree contains the > > > > same last commit to the modified file as usb-next. > > > > > > > > Daniel Vetter mentioned on IRC that it might be better for you to > > > > simply > > > > pick-up the series directly from patchwork, that is fine too in > > > > that > > > > case don't forget to add: > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > To the entire series (given in a reply to the cover-letter) > > > > > > > > And: > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > To the usb/typec patches (patch 7/8), this was given in reply > > > > to a previous posting of the series and I forgot to add this > > > > in the resend. > > > > > > Since this is mostly touching drm core, I think it should be merged > > > to > > > drm-misc-next first, and drm-intel-next after. Please let us know. > > > > I agree this should go to drm-misc-next first. > > > > (I was planning on pushing this to drm-misc-next myself, > > but then ended up going with the topic branch because of the > > conflict in the i915 bits.) > > Just to be clear and avoid confusion: This pull request does apply > cleanly on drm-misc-next nd drm-intel-next right now. > > I'm just waiting for drm-misc-next maintainers to pull this to drm- > misc-next so I can pull it to drm-intel-next. > > Maxime, is that your round now? > or Thomas? That's me, I just pushed it to drm-misc-next Thanks! Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
