On Tue, 04 May 2021, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Newer gcc prints the following warning:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3057:9: warning: ‘intel_print_wm_latency’ reading 16 bytes from a region of size 10 [-Wstringop-overread]
> and some other related warnings in similar functions.
>
> gcc has a point here. Some of the latency arrays only have 5 members,
> but print_wm_latency may read up to max_level returned by ilk_wm_max_level,
> which can be upto 7 for the >= GEN9 case.
>
> So it will read some fields beyond the array.
>
> Increase all the latency fields to 8 members, which is enough for SKL.
>
> I don't know if they are correctly initialized upto 8, but dev_priv
> should start out as zero, so presumably they will be zero.
Thanks, the warning should be fixed by commit
c6deb5e97ded ("drm/i915/pm: Make the wm parameter of print_wm_latency a pointer")
in drm-intel-next.
There doesn't actually seem to be a bug here, but I wonder if we should
send that to stable or v5.13-rc1+ anyway to stop people spending time on
the same issue.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index cb62ddba2035..c80add5f6d33 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1095,11 +1095,11 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
> * in 0.5us units for WM1+.
> */
> /* primary */
> - u16 pri_latency[5];
> + u16 pri_latency[8];
> /* sprite */
> - u16 spr_latency[5];
> + u16 spr_latency[8];
> /* cursor */
> - u16 cur_latency[5];
> + u16 cur_latency[8];
> /*
> * Raw watermark memory latency values
> * for SKL for all 8 levels
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
