From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Newer gcc prints the following warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3057:9: warning: ‘intel_print_wm_latency’ reading 16 bytes from a region of size 10 [-Wstringop-overread]
and some other related warnings in similar functions.
gcc has a point here. Some of the latency arrays only have 5 members,
but print_wm_latency may read up to max_level returned by ilk_wm_max_level,
which can be upto 7 for the >= GEN9 case.
So it will read some fields beyond the array.
Increase all the latency fields to 8 members, which is enough for SKL.
I don't know if they are correctly initialized upto 8, but dev_priv
should start out as zero, so presumably they will be zero.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index cb62ddba2035..c80add5f6d33 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1095,11 +1095,11 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
* in 0.5us units for WM1+.
*/
/* primary */
- u16 pri_latency[5];
+ u16 pri_latency[8];
/* sprite */
- u16 spr_latency[5];
+ u16 spr_latency[8];
/* cursor */
- u16 cur_latency[5];
+ u16 cur_latency[8];
/*
* Raw watermark memory latency values
* for SKL for all 8 levels
--
2.25.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
