On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 01:15:28 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 08:11:05PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:03:56AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > If we couldn't find a pipe we shouldn't return true. This might be even > > > better as a WARN though, since it should be impossible to have the port > > > enabled without a pipe selected. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> > > > > These two fixes are merged for -next, thanks. > > Actually this one here is broken, so I've had to revert it. What failed? How is it possible we'd have a DP port without a pipe? Every pattern in the register field should correspond to a pipe right? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
