On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:15:28AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 08:11:05PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:03:56AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > If we couldn't find a pipe we shouldn't return true. This might be even > > > better as a WARN though, since it should be impossible to have the port > > > enabled without a pipe selected. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> > > > > These two fixes are merged for -next, thanks. > > Actually this one here is broken, so I've had to revert it. I'm also a bit unsure about the DDI one, since if we ever have a port enabled with a bogus pipe link, we probably still want to shut down the port. At least that part is pretty important to not end up with a black screen in a lot of cases, atm Egbert Eich is debugging such a case for sdvo ... -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
